179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
EggyToast
To:
Date:
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:36:12 -0500
Subject:
RE: [idm] OT: Invisibility.
Msg-Id:
<a05010407ba67342db535@[128.220.50.51]>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0302051617001.20181-100000@pidgin.eecs.harvard.edu>
Mbox:
idm.0302.gz
quoted 6 lines I don't get it, looks more like a optical trick than anything else ...>> I don't get it, looks more like a optical trick than anything else ... > >Well, do you think an invisibility cloak is anything but an optical >trick? I imagine the first "real" invisibility cloak will somehow project >all occluded images appropriately rather than make the person transparent >(which would probably be lethal).
Yeah, they should really just call the things transparency cloaks. but saying "I wish I were transparent" sounds... wrong. derek -- eggytoast.com -------------- commerce soon: eggtastic.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org